The Rural Markets are Integrating and Logically So
Dinesh K Kapila
The trigger point for this thought was an observation of a
colleague that the citizens of a comparatively remote mountainous district should
continue to eat or rather accord preference to their traditional foods, snacks
and drinks rather than increasingly opt for modern day, packaged, food
products. This requires a deeper thought and analysis. Can we state that a certain
population should continue to adhere to age old cultural conditions connected
with food or even to broaden it, with other consumer products. The adage of old
is gold, or keep it within the local economy or modern day consumerism is a
negative for rural populations has to be revisited. And immediately.
I remember years ago visiting a local community, if I remember the
Bangana Community, just on the outskirts of the hill town of Solan in Himachal
Pradesh. The community made a living by buying the lower degree of packaged
products and other produce from shopkeepers and selling them with thin margins
at villages. They would trek to the villages and after the sales, trek back in
the late evenings. Their way of life had been threatened by the laying of the
road networks in the areas serviced by them. Now they had to catch a bus, then
after reaching a point where the road ended, then start trekking. The villages
coming on the road networks now were also turning entrepreneurial and posing
stiff competition. The old days were better was the refrain but the need to
adapt was also being recognized.
This is the new reality across India as networks modernise and
communication links strengthen. The rural population has access to the Audio
Visual networks and this is generating it’s own pressures and demand.
Resistance is there, ideologically and culturally but it will wear down in due
course and in consonance with how deep the existing cultural mores are in a
region. Alongside the debate as stated above will continue. I found an
interesting observation by Robert J Gordon in The Rise and Fall of American
Growth, “Networking inherently implies equality. Everyone, rich and poor, is
plugged into the same electric, water, sewer, gas and telephone network. The
poor may only be able hook up years after the rich, but eventually they receive
the same access”. Actually, change does not wait. Across the globe, this is a
fact. In the USA the installation of networks,
rail, electricity, water telephones, formalized the economy exponentially
between 1840 and 1920. The first FMCG Companies evolved in the USA in the 1880s
with the development of refrigerated freight railway wagons and the laying of a
vast railway network. Then started the
development of department stores with attractive displays and packing and the
rise concurrently in consumption of fruits and vegetables all through the year.
Then came mail order catalogues and delivery men for Sears etc along with US
Post. I am only drawing obvious parallels in the Indian context and stating the
formalization of rural India and it’s markets has just begun on a major scale. .
The emergence of rural markets
in India as a segment of a highly untapped potential emphasizes the need to
explore them. Marketers over the past few decades, with varied and innovative
approaches, have attempted to understand and tap rural markets. Some of their
efforts paid off and many sub markets are still an enigma. Rural marketing is
an evolving concept, and as a part of any economy, has untapped potential;
marketers have realized the opportunity quite recently as also it’s challenges.
I strongly feel that improvement in infrastructure and access, promise a bright
future for those intending to go rural. Rural consumers are keen on branded
goods nowadays, so the market size for products and services seems to have
burgeoned. At the same time, a degree of harmonization will prevail across
product categories. Local products would in all probability move to a niche or
adapt to packaging and branding requirements, even if not in the literal
definition of the terms.
Our rural population, in my perception, is now
showing a trend of moving to a state of gradual urbanization in terms of culture,
exposure, habits, lifestyles, and lastly, consumption patterns of goods and
services. Corporates cannot or maybe should not focus on products designed only
for rural markets. They could have a lack of success in designing a product
with a focus more on the on the rural customers, an example, reducing the
product features in order to lower prices is a strategy or gambit which could
actually result in failure. My interaction over the years leads me to state
that the rural buyers like to follow consciously the perceived urban pattern of
living, of course as per their socio economic status and with local cultural
factors accounted for. There is by all degrees of analysis a tremendous
potential for consumer durables like two-wheelers, small cars, television sets,
refrigerators, air-conditioners and household appliances in rural India.
Once I was in the hamlet of Fagu, in HP.
While taking a walk, to see the local conditions and economic activities, I
chanced upon a trunk manufacturer. I asked him about the business, his response
was of a quiet resignation. The market was dwindling as people moved to
suitcases, no matter their uneven quality in the small villages and short life
spans. My reading is that over the year the quality of suitcases would have
improved but that of the steel or metal trunks would have reduced even further.
If anybody noticed, this segment just faded away across India actually in a
span of five to ten years. In the
Kashmir Valley, I noticed in smaller towns, the same packets of water, chips,
biscuits, snacks etc. The brands could be local, catering to local sentiments
or pricing power but the effort is to sell what sells in a an urban market or
semi urban market. At a major village in the plains, I asked a lady,
“ghoonghat” (a sort of veil) and all, as to the benefits of the clean drinking
water being provided through a machine at a subsidized price. Her response was
the expected one on health etc except when she stated “why cannot I drink the
same water which you drink in your city”. Drive through only rural roads of
Punjab, at major junctions (two or more roads converging), consumer products
are of a vast range but the brands could be different. To be more accurate
these brands would also be maybe the same as available in the lower socio
economic tiers in cities but the main issue is that the aspirations are driving
the demand for such products, the brand, quality and pricing may vary.
I
do have a contrary view even if going on a tangent. The traditional Indian
Sweets, what we call “Mithai” is even now not branded but has held it’s own.
Against the chocolate and bakery products, with all the brand power and
packaging and ambience. These products have no branding except our faith and
tastes and yes, maybe the name of establishment is the brand. But the ‘halwai”
does do reasonably well in our nation.
And some have transited to the next stage by way of classy
establishments, clean toilets (yes, it counts), well preserved products in
coolers, proper packaging, introducing bakery products etc. Unique to us, both
products, different in origin, are
expanding the markets and our waists. (Forget
the plains, I suggest a trip to Srinagar to see the local bakeries catering to
local tastes really flourish).
If
we peruse some data, some estimates suggest that 41 % of the middle class is in
rural areas, 58 % of the disposable incomes are in the rural areas. Some data suggests or indicates 70 % of the
toilet soaps and more than 41 % of two wheeler sales are in rural areas. Some
opinions would lead us to believe that broadly the FMCG Sector is growing
faster in the rural areas now. Companies are experimenting with Reverse
Logistics to drive penetration, such as Amul and many at a less successful
level. Literacy levels as I see were abysmal, around 22 % in rural areas in
1947, now they are reported to be above 65 %. Lifestyles are changing, as are
tastes, economic status and the infrastructure (roads, electricity,
communications). As per me this adds up to a high degree aspirations or rather
expectations. The nation is really seeking to move out of it’s stagnation and
the adjusting to living life as it comes over the years.
Challenges
and barriers are many and I would readily acknowledge the same based on visual
evidence and access to data. Poverty in some regions and even in the more
developed regions in endemic and the predominant employment mode is of daily
wagers. This drags down the per capita incomes and concentration of potential
markets. Consumption could be seasonal
(in the small town of Nawanshahr in the Doaba Region of Punjab, the December to
March is NRI Season and hence high sales season) and and the impact of climate, such as the monsoon
is a reality. The poor maintenance of infrastructure is a reality such as of
roads, electricity may be supplied off and on and impact lifestyles and ability
to store, water and irrigation supply infrastructure could run down and impact
generation of incomes, the inability to influence pricing of the produce and
it’s impact on incomes is also a reality.
Companies
are attempting the traditional four A’s to drive penetration, Availability,
Acceptability, Awareness and Affordability. Models such as ITC’s e-Choupal,
it’s Agri Business Venture, and Amul as also HLL’s varied models do work and
have demonstrated success after a time lag. The issue is complex as traditional
channels do not function and local levels of influence have to be incorporated
or dealt with. The major landowner, the local commission agent (arhtiya) and
money lender are realities. However
major brands have evolved also. If I remember correctly a major biscuit brand
with headquarters in UP (Priyagold or maybe a brand close to this name)
evolved after catering to mainly rural
markets. Optimism certainly prevails. I met recently an entrepreneur who is
attempting to be the Amazon or Flipkart of rural India for rural inputs and
products. His repeated forays into the rural areas have convinced him and his
backers that the time for scaling up is now on. He has managed over 75000 to
80000 deliveries already in ten districts in a couple of states while the
project is very much in the design and initial execution stage. Of course it
cannot be like the urban models, some extension service has to be provided to
build credibility and acceptability and a network developed for storage and
delivery. This network has to be credible and willing to be an active participant
on thin margins. Delivery systems are being tracked and developed by algorithms
too. Margins are improving of the main entrepreneur already. The point, markets
are evolving fast and consumption patterns.
A
colleague had a rather interesting insight. The internet is driving awareness
levels and dresses and styles are sought to be imitated. You can control access
to the TV but not to the mobiles. Considerable pockets exist with weak
connectivity but the Government’s broadband drive is having multiple spin offs.
Beauty Culture courses have a major demand in rural areas and so do food
processing and tailoring. It’s an interesting evolution as varying cultures and
generations and both genders attempt to handle the varied viewpoints (or even
throttle, many are feeling threatened too) and they even clash at times.
That
takes us back to the initial point. Can we be nostalgic or rather have opinions
and then state that certain populations should adhere to the age old habits as
they are healthier or local based. I feel it’s time to move on, specially on
consumption and consumer goods. As we evolve and develop, first the newer and
recently introduced products will scale up in sales and demand, then will
plateau. Alongside, the local products, if implicit demand exists, will also
evolve and modernize their products and stage a comeback. I have noticed this
in the Ayurvedic and Unani markets by major groups and also in small towns by
by standalone establishments. The rebalancing will evolve naturally but maybe
not by the same existing players. These are interesting times as the Rural
Markets head for a major transformation.
Just
one more point. Major corporates have actually shied away from investing in the
rural value chains. Perhaps with the introduction of GST and the formalization underway,
they would feel encouraged to invest now. This
would impart the impetus so much needed to open up the rural economy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Good one Dineshji. Actually it is difficult to capture the difficult and diverse nature of rural areas. Your article is interesting and capture important points lucidly..my congratulations
ReplyDelete