What a Performance Appraisal. !
by Dinesh K Kapila
We are all familiar with the
terms PAR – Performance Appraisal Report or as the Government says, Confidential
Reports - CRs. Most corporates or those organisations closely aligned with
corporates have endeavoured to evolve quantifiable parameters and to try to
reduce the textual and subjective element. But many Governments and their
associated organisations continue to persist with the textual orientation. Now
by virtue of sitting on varied Boards or Review Bodies over the years in some capacity or the other, one seeks any
diversion from some boring meetings by perusing the CRs, if they are being discussed.
No matter which State you work in, over the years these have provided even entertainment,
the seriousness of the issue notwithstanding. Even if not directly involved, it does provide some diversion from many routine issues being taken up,
Before I really share, duly
hiding any means of identifying the organisation involved, I have over years
really and honestly admired the deft way in which some reviewing officers and
reporting officers have sought to write the CRs without conveying much or
rather conveying a lot without saying so. “The Officer is tall, has a presence,
has a good deep voice and a lot of confidence due to his connections. This is
his main plus point and describes him well, his connections which he cultivated
with the VIPs. It indicates his self confidence and networking. This is at times helpful to the Organisation also while he uses
them for his own benefit ”. I have read this gem. Then
another, “The Officer has remained very busy in attending to multiple items of
work as stated by him, but results and achievements are not on his agenda. But
he does appear to be always very serious
about his work and always states he is too busy to even attend to routine
supervision of his subordinates. He has a wide circle of friends and contacts
and remains very occupied in attending to them even in office hours at times, this also indicates his
popularity and social skills”. I came across these gems as these officers had
been appealing these observations while the reporting officers stood their
ground ! Stating where is the negativity, we have been so fair !. I had a good time during
discussions, even if not directly involved, the officers concerned were
applying pressure while we knew the facts.
But this takes the cake. What I shall
now reproduce with some editing. This is a real gem. I have never seen this and I doubt most would. I could not believe what was placed before us. On Intelligence and
Ability the officer (being reported upon and incidentally it was accepted by the Reviewing Officer) is stated to be “Average” while on Honesty and Integrity it
is stated to be “Doubtful”. His Attitude towards the Weaker Sections is stated
to be “Extremely Biased”. And his Result and Target Orientation and Focus on achievement is rated simply as “Missing
Entirely”! There are more gems, such as “Very Casual and Non Serious” as
regards attitude, As to Knowledge about his Work Processes and Procedures it is stated to be “Almost Nil”. I was totally taken aback. But there is more, much more.
The pen picture, which I have been
treasuring for the last so many years is wonderful, some excerpts, “A very hostile demeanour
and disposition and physically he is almost violent. Extremely insubordinate
and foul mouthed, dishonest to the core with many charge sheets issued to him.
In a career span of this much years, he has been suspended X times for Y number
of years. It is also added that his bad behaviour is such that this plus his
foul language, there has been at times an extreme form of retaliation from his
staff which includes thrashing him black and blue at one time. Then once by
boycotting him by locking him out of his office for many days. He had to be
suspended to resolve the situation amicably. He has been caught drinking with
the office staff in the office too a couple of times”. There are more colourful
words and vocabulary which I have not added. We do get the drift ! Then it also
states ”his control and supervision is lax as the staff generally revolts
against him at any station due to his way of working with insults”. And to think the guy expected the observations
to be expunged !! and applied pressure too !
How we or rather the organisations involved resolved the issues inspite of reaching out by some people and the processes and stratagems employed are another story. But This sort of keeps one interested
in the routine agenda items and the like and keeps one alert too, it does enable a
more focused attention on serious
matters after perusing such great creativity and word play. !
Comments
Post a Comment